Reply to Hymes's Comment on Prague Functionalism
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Reply to the Comment
In the comment [1], Zanardi and Rasetti argue that several claims in our recent letter [2] are questionable. Here we show these claims remain true. Our points are that (i) the Hamiltonian (1) in Ref. [2] describes amplitude damping as well as phase damping; (ii) the free-Hamiltonian-elimination (FHE) has feasible implementation in practice and there exists a simple FHE procedure which is design...
متن کاملReply to comment.
on " Disentangling residence time and temperature sensitivity of microbial decomposition in a global soil carbon model " The authors used a reduced complexity model (one pool soil decomposition with a temperature and moisture dependency) to study the sensitivity of the carbon stock projections to first order uncertainties. The relative contributions of decomposition (k) and temperature sensitiv...
متن کاملReply to Rachlin’s comment
The primary purpose of our article was to demonstrate unambiguously that matching does not necessarily follow from maximization of overall reinforcement rate, as appears to have been suggested by some writers. Evidently, Rachlin (1979) now accepts that as some slight contribution, since he raises the question, "But are there switching patterns for which matching and maximizing are the same?" wh...
متن کاملReply to the Comment
In their comment to the paper “Theory of the evaporation/condensation transition of equilibrium droplets in finite volumes” [Physica A319, 99 (2003)], Biskup et al. claim that in finite systems at fixed density “the physical significance of the conjugate thermodynamic variable is of dubious value”. This claim is critically discussed.
متن کاملRemarks on reply to Johansen’s comment :-)
Any reader of the paper by Laloux et al. [1] would have been left utterly confused after consulting the time series for the price of Japanese Government Bonds (JGB) around May 1995 looking for a log-periodic power law acceleration in the data. The authors of [1] now confess their error and admit that the prediction date given in [1] was incorrect and that the correct prediction was for August 1...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: American Anthropologist
سال: 1982
ISSN: 0002-7294,1548-1433
DOI: 10.1525/aa.1982.84.2.02a00140